1/30/2024 0 Comments Buy rhino for macWill have to chew on this, but fear the i5 processor might not be up to some of the heavy lifting I generally do. The downside was $300 in adaptors that, and it was a bit weird to get used to no Escape key (correct me if I’m wrong here, or add any additional thoughts Interesting idea that I’d not considered. My guess is the laptop would have to be first, then if Santa brings me a 5 lb box of money I’d also spring for an iMac.Īfter 4 days, Dan said his new 15" MBP touchbar model was both stable and really fast. Whether I can live with a desktop and without a zippy laptop or not is the question. I was surprised to find that the 27" 5K retina iMac was both faster and smoother than the more expensive Mac Pro (which wasn’t even running a 5K monitor). Curiously, I did some back-to-back comparisons with some heavy Rhino files about 1.5 years ago. Agreed on the iMac being a Rhino Monster. If the ports are bothersome and/or the usb-c peripherals you need aren’t out there yet… or for whatever reason you’re not feeling the 2016 then yeah, get a 2015… you can probably get a refurb at a pretty good price point if comparing to a new 2016. Rumor has it, the next version (mid2017) will come out when intel releases a cpu that can use LPDDR4 ram in which case, apple will likely have a 32GB model available… i have a 2013 right now and will probably be holding off til next year to upgrade. To me, the iMacs are really sweet rhino machines and would pick that over anything else… even a mac pro (and probably even a 2016/17 mac pro if that ever comes)… however, if i could only use one computer, it would have to be a laptop and i’d most certainly get one of the 2016 MBPs if my current one bites the dust… idk, they seem to be controversial amongst hardware geeks but personally, i think they’re real nice… I only have anecdotal evidence regarding GPU but my imac is a lot smoother navigating, particularly in ghosted mode, vs my MBP… both nvidia but the imac has 4GB vRam and the MBP has 2GB… however, this may actually be due to the faster CPU in the imac… 3.5GHz vs 2.5 in the MBP… (?) Most of Rhino runs on CPU… the faster the better… get one of the i7 processors (MBP and imac both have an i7 option then a faster i7 option… i’d say at least go with the slower of the two as opposed to an i5 or i3) Please start new related topics and link back to this one if you think it would help.If I recall, Rhino runs heavily (primarily?) off of the video card? If so, is it correct that this is more important than the processing speed of the CPU? PS: I’ve closed this topic intentionally. Thanks for your encouragement and support, Please report bugs in Rhino for Mac forum category.Look through our list of Known Bugs: Rhino for Mac on Apple Silicon list on our bug-tracker.If you have an Apple Silicon M1 Mac, please: We have not yet begun contacting our partners about supporting Apple Silicon.Īll work related to Universal Binary is being done as part of Rhino 8 development. Our vendors need to support Apple Silicon before we can fully support the features we rely on from them. Rhino has many third-party dependencies such as libraries for file import and export. We know it’s a stop-gap solution, and that a Universal Binary is our ultimate goal. If this works, it is the easier path toward support for Apple Silicon for Rhino. This is not yet a fully native version (see below for the distinction).Īpple’s Rosetta Translation Environment attempts to automatically translate Intel applications to run on Apple Silicon. Please update to macOS Big Sur 11.3 (or later). Rhino 7 for Mac is supported on macOS Big Sur 11.3 on Apple Silicon Macs with M1 processors*.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |